Gender issues related to
the differences of male and female were pinpointed in decade of 1950s, but
highlighted as an important issue in management and organizational studies in
between 1980s & 1990s. The duration between these two periods recognized
the gender effects in different studies. Hearn & Parkin (1987) emphasized
on female issue in those organizations who are dominated by male. Gender is
defined as; “Gender comprises a range of differences between men and women,
extending from the biological to the social” “Discrimination is treating
differently on the basis of sex or race” (Word net web) on the basis of above
definitions we can conclude that basically gender discrimination is preference
of one gender upon other. The gender discrimination may exist in various dimensions
which include hiring discrimination, differences in salary and wages, discrimination/differences
in promotion and inequity related to different goods and facilities provided to
different gender. Employee is a back bone of the organization that performs
critical tasks for the survival of the organization and employee productivity
affected by gender discrimination. Therefore this study is designed to
investigate gender discrimination and its affect on employee productivity.
According to a Research
Surveys, 68 percent of women surveyed believe gender discrimination exists in
the workplace. Federal law protects women and other minorities from
discrimination in the work place. The Equal Pay Act of 1963 ended the practice
of paying men more than women when performing the same jobs and duties. In
1964, the Civil Rights Act extended this protection to other minorities.
Despite these protections, many women still feel gender-based discrimination is
a problem in some businesses.
Lost Productivity
Victims of gender
discrimination lose motivation and morale necessary to perform their jobs
effectively. According to a report written by Jodi L. Jacobson of the World Watch
Institute, gender bias also leads to a loss in productivity. Things that may
lead to this loss of morale and motivation could include jokes about an
employee’s gender that imply inferiority, offensive jokes of a suggestive or
sexual nature and jokes implying that an employee’s work is sub-par due to his
or her gender. Federal law prohibits this type of workplace harassment, whether
by superiors or coworkers.
Promotions
Stereotypical views
regarding gender can cause supervisors to engage in the illegal practice of
passing a person over for promotion due to gender. While this can happen to
both genders, supervisors most often pass over women for promotion due to
preconceived notions about their roles and abilities. For example, a fire chief
may repeatedly pass over a female fire fighter for promotion, due to resentment
stemming from women applying to the force or due to a belief that men
inherently perform better in these positions. Supervisors may pass over
qualified males for promotions in industries that employ a high percentage of
women compared to men, such as teaching positions or those industries involving
care of children.
Family Responsibilities
Women who have young
children at home may experience push-back when interviewing due to family
responsibilities. Although law prohibits a prospective employer from asking
about family responsibility outright, it often comes out during the interview
process anyway. This may provoke the hiring manager to pass over a qualified
female candidate if he feels she will be torn between her home and job
responsibilities. If the woman makes it into the position, her supervisor can
view her employee file to see that she has young children signed up on
insurance or other benefits. He then may choose to give her less responsibility
or assign menial tasks to her that do not fit her job description. Although
illegal, this practice still exists in offices today.